She posts a comment about design and points out:
"...many well-known scientists must constantly suppress the suspicion that there is design (poiema) in the universe. For example, he quotes Richard Dawkins, an "arch-Darwinian" who says, "Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose." And he quotes Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA, who says, "Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved."This may well be true. But that does not make it true in any way. The Earth appears flat until you take a longer look. The sun appears to rise and set each day. These are things that were, at one time, apparent to everyone, but as knowledge grew, we understood the truth. Just because design seems to be the easiest and most intuitive solution, don't forget that our perception is limited and we have developed technology and technique to overcome our shortfalls.
Also, I would like to mention that even if there was an intelligent designer (as it seems your argument is implying) it is no guarantee that it is the intelligent designer that you are imagining. And, of course, I see no reason to imagine a designer at all.